October 2018 Program Materials
- Janus v.
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees,
Council 31, et al.,Supreme Court of the United States
Union Lawyer's Obligations to Bargaining Unit Members: A Case
Study of the Interdependence of Legal Ethics and Substantive Law,
The Symposium: The Lawyer's Duties and Liabilities to Third
Parties; Article authored by Russell Pearce, Fordham
University School of Law, 1996
Ethical Issues in Representing Multiple Plaintiffs or
Defendants: Special Issues for Union Counsel; Article
authored by Nora L. Macey at the American Bar Association, Section
of Labor and Employment Law Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois,
August 9, 2005
Janus and the Law of Opt-Out Rights; Harvard Law Review;
Article authored by Aaron Tang, University of California, Davis
School of Law, July 2, 2018
Unpacking the Janus Decision; Article authored by Brian
Miller; Forbes.com; June 27, 2018
4 Things to Watch After the High Court's Body Blow to
Labor; Article authored by Vin Gurrieri; Law360,
June 27, 2018
the Supreme Court's Janus Decision Means for Teacher Unions;
Article authored by Dana Goldstein and Erica L. Green; The
New York Times, June 27, 2018
of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.4, 42 Pa.C.S.A.
- Rules of
Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.5, 42 Pa.C.S.A.
Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.6, 42 Pa.C.S.A.
Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.7, 42 Pa.C.S.A.
Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.9, 42 Pa.C.S.A.
Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.11, 42 Pa.C.S.A.
Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.13, 42 Pa.C.S.A.
November 2018 Program Materials
December 2018 Program Materials
January 2019 Program Materials
Links to Articles:
February 2019 Program Materials
- Mark C.
Palmer, The #MeToo Culture Shift in the Legal Profession,
Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism, August 21,
Lundberg, #MeToo in the Law Firm: Lessons for Lawyers
from the Post-Weinstein Reckoning, Bench & Bar of
Minnesota, February 27, 2018
Martin, Why the #MeToo Movement Should Be Ready for a
Backlash, Politico, December 11, 2017
Deanell Reece Tacha (Ret.), A Case For Litigation Alternatives
in #MeToo Movement, JAMS ADR Blog, May 22, 2018
Giambra, Special Ethical Considerations For Lawyers In The Age
Of #MeToo, Schroder, Joseph & Associates, LLP
- American Bar
Association, Report to the House of Delegates on Resolution 300
(passed), August 2018
Bar Association, Report to the House of Delegates on Resolution
107D, January 2019
of the Dispute Resolution Section of the American Bar Association
in opposition to the ABA's Civil Rights and Social Justice
Section's proposal related to arbitration of discrimination,
harassment and retaliation claims (undated)
Pierce, Lawsuit Accuses Seneca Valley 'mean girls' of Targeting
Boy with False Allegations, TribLIVE.com, October 3,
Proposed Amendments to the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional
Conduct Regarding Misconduct, Pa.B. Doc. No. 18-773, May 19,
Bar Association Model Rule 8.4
Rendleman, The Crusad Against Model Rule 8.4(g), American
Bar Association, October 2018
Hayes, Is Time Really Up For Sexual Harassment in the
Workplace? Companies and Law Firms Respond, American Bar
Association, January 17, 2019
Stolley Persky, The Legal Consequence of Saying #MeToo, DC
Bar News, February 20, 2018
- George W.
Dent Jr., Model Rule 8.4(g): Blatantly Unconstitutional
and Blatantly Political, Faculty Publications, 2017
- Sandra E.
Garcia, The Woman Who Created #MeToo Long Before Hashtags,
The New York Times, October 20, 2017
- Letter to
Kirkland & Ellis LLP from Harvard Women's Law Association,
November 14, 2018
National Law Review, Sexual Harassment Training in the #MeToo
Era, September 10, 2018
April 2019 Program Materials
contains the following materials:
- 8 Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d § 48:76 - 48:77
- 27 Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d § 135:143
- 27 Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d § 135:155 - 135:157
- Opening and Closing Statements in New York State Supreme Court
by Practice Law Litigation
- Final Pretrial Order Under FRCP 16(e) by Practice Law